Citizenship for sale and more refugees on the wave.

Do you remember when Malta refused to welcome refugees in August (2013)? Hundreds of immigrants who were seeking for help offshore, coming from war-torn countries, poverty and precarious living conditions with no human and/or civil rights. Then Italy took the ‘burden’, as many politicians addressed to the issue, and hosted them; 600 immigrants only on 15 August between Sicily and Calabria (South of Italy).

Credits to BBC
Credits to BBC

The small European country is looking at alternative ways for investments to make its economy flourish. Wealthy people bring cash and prosperity, thus Malta decided to welcome only those who can afford the high price to be part of the Maltese family. It decided to sell EU passports for 650,000 euro (US$875,000) as part of a law previously passed that comes with the benefits of EU membership, including the right to reside and work in the 28-member bloc.

The goal of the country is indeed to attract “high value” citizens, as Prime Minister Joseph Muscat said, that can bring benefits to the island by investing and working there. He estimated that 45 potential applicants would raise the country around 30 million euro. Henley and Partners, the global leader in residence and citizenship planning, will be in charge of the bureaucratic process and estimated that the deal will attract up to 300 people annually. Those who purchase passports can then buy citizenship for their immediate family for just 25,000 euro ($33,600).

Credits to RT
Credits to RT

European Union spokesman Michele Cercone said that Malta and other member states have the freedom to choose how and to whom they issue passports. However, the European Commission also states that asylum has to be granted to people fleeing persecution or serious harm in their own country and therefore in need of international protection; this rule is not always applied though. Asylum is a fundamental right; granting it is an international obligation, first recognized in the 1951 Geneva Convention on the protection of Refugees (EC). A EU country cannot refuse refugees that come from war countries or from places where human rights have been drastically violated, but they have also the power to issue passports to whoever they want and thus making distinctions between wealthy and less wealthy.

This is not a new procedure, other EU countries have been relaxing citizenship and residency rules for steep fees. Cyprus, for example, eased citizenship rules for those who lost more than $3.2 million by paying the levy on savings, in an attempt to stop non-resident investors from leaving the country. In the UK, residency permits are easier to obtain for non-EU citizens who have at least $1.6 million available for private investment in the UK. Meanwhile, Spain is planning on granting foreigners residency permits if they purchase a house for more than $215,000, in an attempt to boost the country’s housing sector (data from RT).

The only country who embraced an ‘open-door’ policy with Syrian refugees, who are experiencing one of the worst periods of bloodshed in modern history, was Sweden. The Scandinavian country decided in early September 2013 to give asylum to all Syrian refugees who apply. The decision, said Anders Danielsson, director-general of Sweden’s Migration Board, “stems from the EU’s failure to act on growing numbers of refugees” and was made “because we believe the violence in Syria will not end in the near future.”

Credits to Tundratabloids
Credits to Tundratabloids

In countries like Spain and Greece, where the economic crisis continues to hit hard and unemployment is on the rise, governments fear that helping Syrian refugees may be met with resentment by the local populations. Other states like France and the Netherlands — as well as Greece — are experiencing growing nationalism and xenophobia inflamed by ultra-right movements, and the authorities are all too aware of the sensitivity to bringing in more foreign nationals. Germany during the elections period tried to avoid the sensitive issue of refugees.

EU is failing to agree on a joint European policy on asylum and the national approach, and interest, always prevails. As Céline Bayer, spokesperson for the president of the S&D group in the EP, pointed out though: “A common EU policy would probably be more progressive, more generous than any of the 28 individual policies. And they know that.”

It seems like many EU countries didn’t waste time to apply laws for their own benefit. Fair enough; but don’t play the card of nationalism and national pride that spurs xenophobic policies, when you deny asylum to those who are really in need – as in the case of Syrians – and meanwhile you decide to give away passports or residency permits only on the basis of economic criteria, regardless of the candidate’s nationality. Come on.

Laura Zuffi

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Citizenship for sale and more refugees on the wave.

  1. This article is OBVIOUS. and Nothing new is being shown, places for the wealthy are available always REGARDLESS OF THE COUNTRY. Keep the good work up guys :).

  2. The news about Malta selling citizenship was taken from RT, which released the article yesterday, so I guess it’s quite new! Unfortunately for many people these facts are not obvious and it is our pleasure to inform and also to express opinions about the issue. If you go through the whole article you could find something you didn’t know about, unless you just spent some quality time reading our blog 🙂 thank you for the comment reader!

  3. Thanks for providing the perspective that has been missing from all other news outlets that have covered this story – that while malta tries to attract the rich, it has no sympathy for those in dire need, or the less affluent. Class based discrimination at its best.

    The law should be made illegal in the EU for the sole purpose that it creates a de facto discrimination in accessibility of services, which goes against the EU charter as well as the UDHR.

  4. The issue of selling citizenship is very controversial both for a ethical/moral and ‘nationalistic’ perspective. As you said it creates discrimination and unfortunately states nowadays implement policies based on the principles of self-interest and not human rights oriented. Plus I would rather give the nationality to a kid born in my country and/or a person who has been working there for years, than to a random guy who pours in money. Being part of country is more than investing.

    Thank you for your comment, I’m glad you liked the article! Keep following us 🙂

  5. One sided argument. If Malta is being forced into offering Asylum to as much refugees as possible (good luck with the logistics for such a small rock), why not offer it at a high price to those who can afford it so that the country is a better financial position to help the same refugees amongst other things.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s